User talk:Sciaa: Difference between revisions

From PS3 Developer wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==My talk page index== ===Some things here=== Stuff... ><(((º> ===User feedback=== Here other users can share a talk with me, please make a sectiong for every problem, so i...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


====CFW2OFW is not HAN only====
====CFW2OFW is not HAN only====
I noticed lot of people have a misunderstanding related with that wiki page. The CFW2OFW method existed way before HAN was published. Initially it was used in combination with the official hdd backup/restore utility + some other hacks/tools. With HAN is different (and i ignore the differences btw), but this is why some of the games that was reported as "playable" now doesnt seems to work in HAN. But usually that reports saing it was "playable" was correct (and now other wiki editors are overriting them with an "unplayable" in a bit egoistic way, or because they ignores what im explaining here). Incase of doubt you can make a search at the "page history" to see who was the user that wrote that "playable", by knowing his nick (incase he was registered) you can sometimes talk with him to ask him what he did, or if is an user with some reputation then you should think twice before "flipping" his report from the "playable" he wrote to an "unplayable" (that most probably is going to be wrong and is going to cause some chaos). You has been mantaining that CFW2OFW compatibility page (and you know this better than me) so please keep an eye at this kind of edits that are flipping a "playable" by an "unplayable" because most are a mistake
I noticed lot of people have a misunderstanding related with that wiki page. The CFW2OFW method existed way before HAN was published. Initially it was used in combination with the official hdd backup/restore utility + some other hacks/tools. With HAN is different (and i ignore the differences btw), but this is why some of the games that was reported as "playable" now doesnt seems to work in HAN. But usually that reports saying it was "playable" was correct (and now other wiki editors are overriting them with an "unplayable" in a bit egoistic way, or because they ignores what im explaining here). Incase of doubt you can make a search at the [[CFW2OFW_Compatibility_List|page history]] (by clicking in the "diff" of the edits) to see who was the user that wrote that "playable", by knowing his nick (incase he was registered) you can sometimes talk with him to ask him what he did, or if is an user with some reputation then you should think twice before "flipping" his report from the "playable" he wrote to an "unplayable" (that most probably is going to be wrong and is going to cause some chaos). You has been mantaining that CFW2OFW compatibility page (and you know this better than me) so please keep an eye at this kind of edits that are flipping a "playable" by an "unplayable" because most are a mistake

Revision as of 12:35, 11 October 2018

My talk page index

Some things here

Stuff... ><(((º>

User feedback

Here other users can share a talk with me, please make a sectiong for every problem, so i can delete them when i consider convenient/solved

CFW2OFW is not HAN only

I noticed lot of people have a misunderstanding related with that wiki page. The CFW2OFW method existed way before HAN was published. Initially it was used in combination with the official hdd backup/restore utility + some other hacks/tools. With HAN is different (and i ignore the differences btw), but this is why some of the games that was reported as "playable" now doesnt seems to work in HAN. But usually that reports saying it was "playable" was correct (and now other wiki editors are overriting them with an "unplayable" in a bit egoistic way, or because they ignores what im explaining here). Incase of doubt you can make a search at the page history (by clicking in the "diff" of the edits) to see who was the user that wrote that "playable", by knowing his nick (incase he was registered) you can sometimes talk with him to ask him what he did, or if is an user with some reputation then you should think twice before "flipping" his report from the "playable" he wrote to an "unplayable" (that most probably is going to be wrong and is going to cause some chaos). You has been mantaining that CFW2OFW compatibility page (and you know this better than me) so please keep an eye at this kind of edits that are flipping a "playable" by an "unplayable" because most are a mistake