Editing Talk:PARAM.SFO

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 117: Line 117:
***Who is the responsible of loading parts sellectivelly from each of them ?, is just by the presence of the same param_key's in the internall SFO ?. In this case the third byte of ATRIBUTE should be an exception of this rule because the ATTRIBUTE flags in the patch (overwrite flags) uses the third byte, but ATTRIBUTE flags in the disc in third byte are readed too because contains features that are not overwrited (as game purchase enabled, install packages, etc...)
***Who is the responsible of loading parts sellectivelly from each of them ?, is just by the presence of the same param_key's in the internall SFO ?. In this case the third byte of ATRIBUTE should be an exception of this rule because the ATTRIBUTE flags in the patch (overwrite flags) uses the third byte, but ATTRIBUTE flags in the disc in third byte are readed too because contains features that are not overwrited (as game purchase enabled, install packages, etc...)
***XMB database stores a copy of all PARAM.SFO's. Is posible the 2 files (SFO from disc, and SFO from his patch) are merged before indexed in database ? (or some of his values, more specifically the resulting of applying the overwrite flags from the patch)
***XMB database stores a copy of all PARAM.SFO's. Is posible the 2 files (SFO from disc, and SFO from his patch) are merged before indexed in database ? (or some of his values, more specifically the resulting of applying the overwrite flags from the patch)
**The process of adding or removing a flag from a previous value of ATTRIBUTE is simply a math operation with numberic values, some of the flags for patches overwrites ATTRIBUTE, but there is one that allows to overwrite Remote Play (an ATTRIBUTE flag) and RESOLUTION, SOUND_FORMAT (param_key's)... The overwriting of param_key's is a different process (not a math calculation) where the new value replaces the old value. What all them has in common is all overwrited data types (math calculations with ATTRIBUTE values or overwriting of RESOLUTION and SOUND_FORMAT) are "integer 4 bytes"
**Why overwrite Remote Play (an ATTRIBUTE flag) and RESOLUTION, SOUND_FORMAT (param_key's) are grouped together ?... This is a bit weird


==CONTENT_ID, NP_COMMUNICATION_ID, NPCOMMID (Network and purchase features)==
==CONTENT_ID, NP_COMMUNICATION_ID, NPCOMMID (Network and purchase features)==
Please note that all contributions to PS3 Developer wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see PS3 Developer wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)