Editing Talk:PARAM.SFO
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 431: | Line 431: | ||
=Todo and Suggestions= | =Todo and Suggestions= | ||
*'''Parameters requirements table''' has lot of "yes" that should be "opt" (optional). The "yes" means the value is mandatory, so the table is not fully correct.Also... this table represents the values needed for each content ordered by CATEGORY, but there are different contents that shares the same CATEGORY (like the different types of patches, DLC's, and game installations... alll them uses "'''GD'''". The "parameter table" cant contain all this different variations, by now i dont see a way to do it--[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 12:25, 29 January 2014 (EST) | *'''Parameters requirements table''' has lot of "yes" that should be "opt" (optional). The "yes" means the value is mandatory, so the table is not fully correct.Also... this table represents the values needed for each content ordered by CATEGORY, but there are different contents that shares the same CATEGORY (like the different types of patches, DLC's, and game installations... alll them uses "'''GD'''". The "parameter table" cant contain all this different variations, by now i dont see a way to do it--[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 12:25, 29 January 2014 (EST) | ||
*'''Bluray Games structure table''' needed to decide if using the new table format that is extremilly complicated internally (very hard to add cells, and even to edit them, it will be a pain to mantain) but very usefull, or the old "folder tree text format" that is ugly and doesnt allows to add all the info needed to represent the structure... I cant decide, i dont like them so i would like to find a new way... maybe nesting tables... maybe with a wiki plugin that doesnt exist ? dunno by now --[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 12:25, 29 January 2014 (EST) | |||
*'''HDD Games structure table''' Find a way to make a table similar than bluray disc structure contents, but for pkg file/folders contents. This needs the same format than bluray structure and will solve the problem of finding a place to list all the reserved fodler names that doesnt belongs to discs | |||
*The internal structure example for SFO needs to be replaced by a new one with at least 2 parameters, this will make more obvious how are meassured the relative offsets displacements | *The internal structure example for SFO needs to be replaced by a new one with at least 2 parameters, this will make more obvious how are meassured the relative offsets displacements | ||
*Is needed an explain of how the file is loaded in stages by the system, how is indexed, and the method to access single areas to update single values, the rebuilding process, etc... this is complex and i ignore (but i imagine) how is made by the PS3, but the source codes i saw that manages SFO files uses different methods and styles (and probably some others i ignore), by now im not skilled enought to discuss this in the page but an open talk about all this could be interesting --[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 23:41, 15 February 2014 (EST) | *Is needed an explain of how the file is loaded in stages by the system, how is indexed, and the method to access single areas to update single values, the rebuilding process, etc... this is complex and i ignore (but i imagine) how is made by the PS3, but the source codes i saw that manages SFO files uses different methods and styles (and probably some others i ignore), by now im not skilled enought to discuss this in the page but an open talk about all this could be interesting --[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 23:41, 15 February 2014 (EST) |