Talk:Syscon Thermal Configs

From PS3 Developer wiki
Revision as of 06:42, 7 May 2021 by Sandungas (talk | contribs) (Reminder, i will publish the example later to compare the differences)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Other Official Thermal Configs

CRC32: F0899A5E (syscon csum: 0E17)

33 40 48 4D 5A 66 73 80 99 FF 00 4A 00 4B 00 4C
00 4D 00 4E 00 4F 00 50 00 51 00 52 00 55 00 00
00 45 80 45 00 46 80 46 00 47 80 47 00 48 80 48
00 49 33 FF 01 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

33 40 48 4D 5A 66 73 80 99 FF 00 53 00 54 00 55
00 56 00 57 00 58 00 59 00 5A 00 5B 00 5F 00 00
00 4E 80 4E 00 4F 80 4F 00 50 80 50 00 51 80 51
00 52 33 FF 01 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

33 40 48 4D 5A 66 73 80 99 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF 33 FF 01 00 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

33 40 48 4D 5A 66 73 80 99 FF 00 3C 00 3D 00 3E
00 3F 00 40 00 41 00 42 00 43 00 44 00 47 00 00
80 38 00 39 80 39 00 3A 80 3A 00 3B 00 3C 80 3C
00 3D 33 FF 01 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

33 40 48 4D 5A 66 73 80 99 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF 33 FF 01 00 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

FF FF 00 4D 14 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
54 00 55 00 02 00 5E 00 5F 00 02 00 FF FF FF FF
02 00 46 00 47 00 02 00 FF FF FF FF 02 00 FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 17 0E


CRC32: xxxxxxxx

  • Found in PS3 models:

There is a "bastard brother" of the NPX-001 thermal config from frontpage with CRC32: ABC9DF9E
The only difference in between them are a couple of bytes actually labeled as "unknown"
This sucks because it "breaks" the checksum and it seems is going to be needed to add both examples in the list... but is also very interesting because eventually could help to identify that "unknown" bytes